<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Nate Says &#187; keywords</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.nathancheeley.com/tag/keywords/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.nathancheeley.com</link>
	<description>Why So Serious?</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 28 Apr 2010 23:18:53 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>SEO 101: Ur Doin It Wrong</title>
		<link>http://www.nathancheeley.com/seo-101-ur-doin-it-wrong/</link>
		<comments>http://www.nathancheeley.com/seo-101-ur-doin-it-wrong/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 06 Dec 2009 21:38:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Nate</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Internet Marketing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[keywords]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[search engine marketing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SEO]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nathancheeley.com/?p=306</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[We get so wrapped up in all the goofy aspects of SEO, we seem to forget the fact that people are looking for answers from a search engine. Which means, users are asking a question in the form of some keywords. Which meaaaaans, we do an extremely poor job of answering their questions.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A couple months back, Microsoft unloaded 80 to 100 million dollars on commercial advertising for their new &#8220;decision engine&#8221; Bing. I have to admit, I might have lol&#8217;d a little at their campaign. But come on, it was awesome. They must have hired someone with a Mac sense of humor. In case you missed it, here&#8217;s some examples:</p>
<p><a style="margin: 0pt auto; padding: 0px 6px; text-align: center; display: block;" id="aptureLink_393GquNp25" href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6jMt6saTqq4"><img title="Bing Search Overload Syndrome: Cell Phone" src="http://i.ytimg.com/vi/6jMt6saTqq4/0.jpg" style="border: 0px none ;" height="285px" width="456px"></a></p>
<p>So what does this have to do with SEO? <span id="more-306"></span>If we look at <strong>Search Engine Marketing</strong> as <strong>Customer Service</strong> &#8211; these commercials are spot on. Basically, my internet marketing friends, this ad campaign is <em><strong>our</strong></em> fault, and everyone who laughed at these commercials is laughing primarily at <strong>you</strong>. You should be more mad at yourself than Google is.</p>
<p><img alt="" src="http://www.nathancheeley.com/images/just-stop-it.jpg" title="Just Stop It" class="alignright" width="150" height="180" />We get so wrapped up in all the goofy aspects of SEO, we seem to forget the fact that people are looking for answers from a search engine. Which means, users are asking a question in the form of some keywords. Which meaaaaans, we do an extremely poor job of answering their questions.</p>
<p>Who cares, right? You&#8217;re getting the traffic. Your conversion rate and bounce rate are where they should be! </p>
<p>Hey, listen Goo-Roo, I&#8217;m sure I don&#8217;t look like a guy who cares, so do the math yourself.</p>
<p>If you&#8217;re not targeting specific pages for specific keywords (and by that I mean <strong>using specific pages to answer specific questions</strong>) then think about how many visitors your site is bleeding off each month. </p>
<p>Maybe, <strong><em>maybe</em></strong> Google calls SEOs criminals because that&#8217;s the best descriptive container to explain how we&#8217;re treating our potential customers. </p>
<blockquote><p>Instead of acting like human-cattle herders, we should be focusing on the visitor paths.</p>
<p><small><a href="http://twitter.com/home?status=RT @NateCheeley: Instead of acting like human-cattle herders we should be focusing on the visitor paths! http://budurl.com/vpaths">Tweet This Rule!</a></small></p></blockquote>
<ul>
<li><strong>Where have they come from?</strong> <em>Does the landing page answer the question indicated by their keywords?</em></li>
<li><strong>What specifically are they looking for?</strong> <em>Could you benefit from creating more specific pages under a broad one?</em></li>
<li><strong>Where did they go to next if they didn&#8217;t bounce?</strong> <em>Did they move the direction you want them to?</em></li>
</ul>
<p>Answer these questions for yourself to find out if you&#8217;re answering the questions being brought to you. You will likely find you can segment your traffic in a much more user-oriented way. This is the difference between a great site and an OMG site that can seemingly read minds.</p>
<p>Make the visit personal. Figure out the conversation your customers/visitors are having with your site, then make it better.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.nathancheeley.com/seo-101-ur-doin-it-wrong/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
